• IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      11 days ago

      That’s not doing facial recognition though, that’s a reverse image lookup. It’s a lot easier to find an exact match for a photo.

      • ZeroCool@vger.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        11 days ago

        Shhhh they think they’ve outsmarted the shitpost. Let’s just let ‘em have this one. They could probably use the win.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 days ago

      Exploitable

      Replace top clown with normal person to show it finding that Juggalo

      (Apparently that’s Violent J, next to his buddy… Shaggy 2 Dope)

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      I presume the facial recognition would be trying to match against faces without the makeup.

      If you always use the same makeup pattern, then I guess it can latch onto that like anything else, if trained to do so.

      Also note that facial recognition tries to break down a face into discrete “pieces” so it can match a face in profile against the same face from the front. In your example the image is visually similar because they are both exactly the same angle, no ‘facial recognition’ involved. If it can’t figure out what a cheekbone is, what a nose is, generally what a ‘face’ is, then that would count as fouling the facial recognition because it would be unable to use a reference facial database.