• Cruxifux@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    247
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    Banning elbows not being allowed on the table and hats not being allowed indoors are also wins for me

    • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      92
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      Elbows have always been allowed on the table. The rule for fancy dining was that you couldn’t have elbows on the table during a course, i.e., when people are actively eating, but before/after, it’s fine. That’s a reasonable rule to be considerate of space.

      • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        3 days ago

        Never been an issue for me. The issue would be invading someone’s personal space. Maybe we just have bigger tables where I live.

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        If elbows aren’t allowed on a table during a course of a fancy dinner, they have definitely not always been allowed on the table.

          • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            23
            ·
            3 days ago

            If you have a large number of people eating in comparison to the size of the table, and the table is already covered in food, the only place on the table to put your elbows is in other people’s personal space.

            The rule should be “no elbows right next to someone else’s food” but neurotypicals are terrible at communicating due to their underdeveloped social skills and empathy.

            • PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              3 days ago

              People other than you, who are not “neurotypicals” whatever tf that even means, are able to accomplish seating large amounts of people at a table and use basic table manners just fine. It’s just common courtesy.

              • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                15
                ·
                3 days ago

                Yes, neurotypicals are indeed able to have large family dinners. But they have to do it using table manners as a crutch. They can’t just have an honest conversation about what’s really necessary, they need to rely on this social construct to tell people what to do without explaining why. It’s a great weakness. If only the average person weren’t so afraid to introspect and to question why we do things.

                • Tankton@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  14
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Tell me you have autism without telling me you have autism.

                  • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    9
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    Which is kind of the point he is making. Instead of engaging in a honest talk and understanding the reasoning behind social norms, they are just pushed as normative and understandably confusing to people who struggle with “just behave like everyone else, lol”.

                    Ironically this is exposing us neurotypicals to be socialy underdeveloped instead of non neurotypical people.

                  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 days ago

                    except he literally implied it to you, and is trying to have an honest conversation about it

          • PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            28
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Respect. Culture. Table manners.
            Take your pick.

            Edit. Personal eating space is probably the most realistic answer.

        • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          Well it’s never been an issue in any space I’ve eaten in, so I think you’re wrong.

          • PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Good to know you’ve never sat at a table with a lot of people, I guess? Or next to an opposite handed person.

      • Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        I mean doesn’t everyone still at least wear the stretchy shorts under their dress? Like I’m not going just panties. That seems so lewd.

        • GingerGoodness@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 days ago

          As someone who can’t sit straight I only wore shorts and trousers until I learnt this trick in my twenties. While I personally don’t find it lewd, other people clearly do and I get so pissed off every time someone feels the need to inform me that they’ve been looking up my skirt.