• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        49
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        You’d think they would be a fan of the people that caught Hunter Biden in a crime…

        Do you think they could find out other people were committing similar crimes? And that those people are also rich? Maybe elected officials even? Hmm…

        • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          6 months ago

          They aren’t interested in crime. They aren’t interested in law. They aren’t interested in policy. They are obsessed with punishment.

          • squiblet@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            They’re obsessed with their own power and money imo. Prisons make money, and keep the proles in line using fear. That’s the whole reason for the drug war - Nixon etc wanted to harm their political enemies, as in leftists and minorities, while also grifting money from the government and increasing authoritarianism.

        • just_change_it@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          you don’t understand, after they gut the irs funding they’ll replace all the management positions with politically chosen replacements, then force investigations to solely target their political rivals. No resources left to investigate their buddies.

          That’s the strategy now. All competitors are ‘crooks’.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    change that m to a b in “delinquent millionaires” and then we’ll have something.

    A guy with $2 million isn’t the problem, the guy with $1 billion is.

    “What’s the difference between a million and a billion?”

    “About a billion.”

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      6 months ago

      Given its $160k a year for an auditor’s salary… maybe $200 when all is said and done with benefits, then $2 million is a solid return on investment. I’ll take it.

      • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        That’s the logic they all follow … I don’t own $1 billion … I own $1 million and everyone else just calls it $1 billion and I tell some people to believe it and others to not believe it … it’s all a question of faith and belief … my shareholders believe I have $1 billion but we tell the government to believe that I only own $1 million.

        When you have access to millions and billions, you can make anyone believe whatever you want them to believe.

        • novibe@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          It’s all really power in the end. Which is why you see many of the most powerful people in the world nowhere near the “Forbes” list. Money is a representative of power under capitalism, but having more money than everyone else isn’t necessary to have power over them.

          Case in point Elongated Muskrat. Sure he is powerful enough to destroy one of the biggest social media networks, but he can’t change the system as a whole, and if the system deems him too much of a nuisance he is gone

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    6 months ago

    Which is probably less than a percent of what they owe if the IRS would successfully unravel all those Delaware, Kitts and Nevis, Bermudas, etc. “company” structures.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Getting $500MILLION from Millionaires is HORRIBLE! We need to SAVE that money by Starving Children instead!

  • Habahnow@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 months ago

    The article doesn’t seem to indicate the ROI of the influx of new money to the IRS vs extra money received because of this influx. Only reason I care about ROI with this agency is 1) only real agency that makes money. 2) IRS had indicated before that they can generate something like 7 USD per 1 USD they are given for funding and I’d like to see if that plays out.

    Regardless, I’m glad te IRS is getting the funding it needs to go after the rich.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      They basically get an extra $6 billion each year over the next decade. So this would be a decent chunk of that. They have also recovered hundreds of millions in fraudulent PPP loans. They are also pushing to recover $29 billion in back taxes from Microsoft. A lot of those things they would not have been able to do before.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    Centrists gonna be like “he taxed the rich more than any president evar” even though this is an insulting pittance.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Annual revenue is roughly $4.71 trillion for FY23. I can’t be sure if that includes the $500 million, but if we were to add it to the total revenue, it would be $4.7105, or roughly one tenth of one percent of the total. It’s also roughly 1-2% of the amount rich people owe that they aren’t paying.

        Imagine if you ate at a restaurant with a large group, and when the bill came, it was $14,700. Everyone ponied up, but you were short on what you owed by $100. So you say, “let me run to my car because I have some extra money there.” You come back in with a dollar and two quarters.

        Should we be excited? Is that a significant portion of what you owe? Is that a significant portion if the bill?

        https://www.businessinsider.com/rich-people-tax-evasion-owe-billions-returns-2023-10?op=1

        • squirmy_wormy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          So you’re complaining that the rich are starting to pay their taxes and we gained half a billion them.

          • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            I’m complaining that the rich aren’t paying their taxes, and they are pretending that pocket change is a good start.

            • squirmy_wormy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              On a report of the rich beginning to pay their taxes, you are complaining that they aren’t paying their taxes.

              • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                6 months ago

                That’s my fucking point! THIS ISN’T A REPORT THAT THE RICH ARE BEGINNING TO PAY THEIR TAXES!! This is a report that the rich are continuing to get away with the overwhelming majority of their tax fraud.

        • blandfordforever@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          Its a good start! Lets send them all digging through their cars. Especially when we know that each of these people actually has far more than a few coins that fell between the seats.

          • ohitsbreadley@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Fuck that, let’s just repossess their Lambos, Ferraris, Bugattis and whatever other gold plated platinum bullshit they own and sell it.

            Why are we asking for loose change?

          • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            No, it’s not a good start. This isn’t fucking day one of taxes existing. Tax fraud is theft from everyone else. They owe all of it. Not 1%, not 1.5%, not 2%. They are deep in the hole, and have been for decades. This is 98% continuing tax fraud. A thief that only takes 98% of your wallet is not starting down the path to righteousness.

            • blandfordforever@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 months ago

              Haha. Well, I agree with you. I think they should pay 100%. I’m saying that its good that the needle is moving.

      • citrusface@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        I suppose - but like there decades worth of back taxes. 500 is a good start maybe, but we all know they are dodge taxes and being taxed at lower rates than poor an middle classs and you know what there is no point in even talking about it because itll just work me up and I can’t change anything so I’ll just keep focusing on my community instead. Thank you.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                13
                ·
                6 months ago

                The IRS doesn’t have to unveil back taxes paid by millionaire households. They do it for a reason. Why do you think that is?

                • deur@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  Braindead reply as expected. How dare they show what they did with the new funding, its almost like they do need to on some level report on the results of now funding efforts so that they can continue to get said funding. Who knew a government organization would allow for some transparency between them and their government & civilians.

                • squirmy_wormy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Because for the first time in a long time, they got proper funding to do this task. That funding is now back under the gun, so any progress they made is evidence towards or against it continuing.