• betanumerus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The reason corporations exist is to separate company finances from personal finances. Not this newly made up voting BS.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why go through all the trouble of simulating that you have a Democracy by having Money sponsoring politicians in a system where only a few politicians can de facto be elected, when you can have Money just directly vote?!

    Seems a lot more efficient if you remove intermediary steps and middlemen.

    Also removing all the smoke & mirrors is a lot more honest.

    I am actually surprised they’ve become so open about the system being an Oligarchy rather than a Democracy.

    • Corvidae@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      Zappa said something like, "They’ve moved the tables and chairs out of the way and pulled the curtains back so we can see the brick wall at the back of the theater.

      • Maeve@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Zappa was libertarian, iirc, but that was when the word hadn’t been bastardized, yet.

    • MsPenguinette@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      Grifting for tax dollars. They are cucks for businesses. There are less people than businesses and the state government knows what side their bread is buttered on

  • frongt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 days ago

    As people have been saying for years, I’ll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    2 days ago

    If companies can vote, have free speech rights, and are people then why is it legal for one company to own another? Isn’t that slavery?

  • School_Lunch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    2 days ago

    How? Wouldn’t they have to go through a voter registration process that requires a voter id and ss#, and who casts the vote? The CEO or someone selected from the board?.. and couldn’t some rich asshole just start a whole bunch of corporations to give themselves as many votes as they want? This blatantly goes against the one person one vote principle.

  • WesternInfidels@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 days ago

    The lawsuit [doesn’t] show “that entity property owners vote sufficiently as a bloc to usually defeat the preferred candidates of natural persons…”

    This is “no harm no foul,” except it’s a judge and he’s actually making this argument seriously.

    “Persons” don’t vote. Citizens do.

    • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      Just to drive that home, here are the voting requirements from the Delaware Dept. of Elections:

      You may register to vote in Delaware if you:

      • Are a citizen of the United States; AND
      • Are a resident of Delaware (Delaware is your home); AND
      • Will be 18 years old on or before the date of the next General Election.

      I don’t see how any of the listed entities could meet those criteria.

      • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Some corporations are over 18 years of age, so no problem there. And we already know that they’re citizens, while the plebian inhabitants of the country are merely consumers. So it all works out.

        • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          If you’re referring to the Citizens United ruling, you should know that it did not establish that corporations are citizens, at all. It simply allowed that money spent by corporations on political candidates is a form of free speech, and it got rid of a bunch of limits on political spending. Which is certainly bad enough, but it in no way paves the way for a company to be a citizen or have a vote.

        • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Kind of difficult to vote if you aren’t registered, despite what Republicans would have you believe.

  • Ænima@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ok, and if they’re people then we can apply legal ramifications to them, right? Right?!?!

  • frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 days ago

    How can you vote as an individual and corporate entity? Could one not just incorporate hundreds of companies just to annihilate other voters?

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 days ago

      There are more businesses than people in Delaware. The registered businesses outnumber the population 2:1.

      This blatantly renders human voters meaningless without businesses to back your opinion.

  • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 days ago

    “A novel ruling,” Christ almighty.

    Karsnitz dismissed the lawsuit from Delaware’s Superior Court, citing “the principle of one person/entity/one vote.”

    This is how you get people to bring back dragging someone into the street and horsewhipping them. I’m not advocating it, it’s just the natural response some people are going to have to being told corporations get to vote in a state with more corporations than people.

  • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    So… if I own a company and spin off… oh, lets say a million shell corporations, have I generated a million voters?