• InvalidName2@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 minutes ago

    As a kid, I was targeted by one of the local churches that some of my family members attended at the time. Apparently at some point in early grade school, some of my school peers who went to that church informed the pastor that I believe in evolution. From then on, adults from that church and kids I went to school with coordinated in tandem to ridicule and isolate me – a literal child.

    Far too many of these people are evil to their core. If they’ll harass and intimidate other peoples’ children, they’ll surely cross any other boundary. It’s not even about being unintelligent, so many are simply willfully ignorant.

  • VelvetPinkOtter123@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    27 minutes ago

    I’m part of some “Flat Earth Debate” groups because I love talking about physics

    They are definitely out there and it does not matter what reality says because they claim that’s “man” and man never knows better than God

    I’m telling you, you could put these people on a rocket, blast them into space, push them out into space with no space suit so they can see the round spinning “water ball” with their own un-filtered eyes and moments before their head froze in the vacuum of space their last thought would be, “the devil has taken my eyes”

  • Impractical_Island@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    36 minutes ago

    Technically, neither side can prove our experiential realities are procedurally generated because for all we know CERN is the equivalent of Mario and Luigi smashing Bob-ombs together. Meditation leads to some insights though, such as how important intention is in the entanglement process of the mind. Whether this entanglement process is Karma and results in the procedural generation of each of our realities is up for debate, and personally I don’t want to debate someone who won’t do their own experiments to know what I’m talking about.

  • Kurtismayfield@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Oh god, there are soo many easy ways out of a literal interpretation of the bible…time isn’t the same for God, etc.

    Lead can’t exist in a 7000 year timeframe…

    • InvalidName2@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 minutes ago

      Hand-waving it all away is their superpower. Hon, with “The Lord™”, all things are possible. Even lead in a 7,000 year time frame.

      Not to mention that most of them consider science to be suspicious and wouldn’t have even the remotest idea of what lead has to do with anything. Even if you tried to explain it like you’d explain to a 5 year old, they would not get it. Partially because they aren’t capable, but partially because they don’t want to get it.

  • Cypressed@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    15 hours ago

    for a second there I thought this was an atheist saying that the cave guide was spouting info from a religious perspective and therefore the information was wrong.

    how disappointing.

  • Hinterwalder@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I grew up in a religious sect that believed this. I was a young earth Creationist but never bought into the 6-7,000 year age of earth variety. That seemed obviously forced to me. I didn’t think the genealogies proved much of anything because they aren’t internally consistent . I also believed in evolution, just not as a theory of origin.

    That said, even as someone who could accept a 20,000 year age of earth, I never felt the need to interrupt others in public. I recognized it wasn’t going to convince anyone and was just a dick move. I think most Creationists also view these people as weird assholes.

    • FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I think creationists are weird arseholes who just keep their shit quiet when they know they are outnumbered

      They get plenty mouthy when they feel bold enough

      Because they’re stupid, and ignorant, and incredibly insecure (because they know they’re stupid) when they hear intelligent people talk of things that are beyond their understanding

      • Hinterwalder@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I think similar thoughts toward those who harbor these opinions about Creationists.

        40% of Americans are Creationists. If they were all as you say, these things would happen to all of us all day, every day. But they don’t because most Creationists are capable of nuanced thinking and don’t stereotype everyone who disagrees with them.

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    16 hours ago

    What’s more… The age of the earth is never mentioned in the Bible. They just counted the years roughly using the genealogies in the various books.

    These people just believe what they’re told by the clergy of whatever version of Christianity they aspire to.

  • d.rizo@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    120
    ·
    1 day ago

    Maybe we should start reviewing churches the same way: Nice church but the guy at the front was talking funny about his imaginary friend… Only two stars.

      • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        1 day ago

        The priest clearly doesn’t know what he’s talking about. Matthew 6:5-6 states “And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.”. One star for not obeying the Bible.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          You are not wrong but Jesus wasn’t against group prayer, he intended on building a church a few pages later

          Matthew 16:18

          And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it.

          You should have referenced a couple of pages after that where he has something direct to say about preachers

          Matthew 23:8-12

          “But you are not to be called ‘Rabbi,’ for you have one Teacher, and you are all brothers. And do not call anyone on earth ‘father,’ for you have one Father, and he is in heaven. Nor are you to be called instructors, for you have one Instructor, the Messiah. The greatest among you will be your servant. For those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted.

          Jesus had some pretty rad opinions even if his reasoning was often flaky

          • Sarah Valentine@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it.

            Peter was demonstrably a superstitious idiot throughout the gospels. Jesus was just letting us all know what kind of people would be in charge of the organized religions with his name on them.

          • SnailMagnitude@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Matthean Jesus is cut your balls off for god levels of wild.

            I’m not sure one can just pick lines out of random Gospels as ‘what Jesus said’, the US got really weird with that a while back with a red letter 4 gospel meme thing going viral.

            • 418_im_a_teapot@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 hours ago

              I’m not sure one can just pick lines out of random Gospels as ‘what Jesus said’,

              That’s literally how Christianity works. I don’t know of any denomination that follows the entire Bible exactly. It’s not even possible because the text is self-contradictory in places.

          • suigenerix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Yes, sure, he’s a little flaky. But God is just so perfect, all loving, and timeless…

            Exodus 21:20-21:

            Anyone who beats their male or female slave with a rod must be punished if the slave dies as a direct result, but they are not to be punished if the slave recovers after a day or two, since the slave is their property.

        • NABDad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          24 hours ago

          This right here. If you’re going to post a review of a church, review them based on how their actions conflict with what they claim to believe.

    • Clutter@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      More importantly, if your faith is having an effect on policy… guess what, your religion must now start paying taxes.

      Why should the rest of us pay for your idiotic ideas that are now turning into policy and law.

      • baronvonj@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        22 hours ago

        That would gladly pay the taxes if it means they get to force their religion on people. They already openly.defy election law by endorsing candidates and "vote yes on prop 66” statements during services, inviting prosecution because they expect to win in court.

    • FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I have been told that their god made time move at different rates, just because, and that’s why it’s different according to physics vs their fairytale

  • Z745812939054@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    190
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    when people flat out refuse to consider facts, evidence, reality in forming their worldview, then the only thing left is mockery and ridicule, lest other people buy into the stupid bullshit

    religion is a fucking cancer on the human species–it’s causing preventable deaths (“nO iNsULiN fOr BaBy!!! PRAYING WILL FIX IT”), and it’s long past time for it to be relegated to the embarrassing/shameful/fucking asinine drawer of history files

      • sit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        ·
        1 day ago

        And worse they exist in sufficient numbers for political parties wanting to cater to their views and ideas, changing the political landscape. Influencing policies, law making.

        (This is a pretty echoey comment I guess)

        • rayyy@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          They captured the religious racists in the south with the “Southern strategy” then Jerry Falwell captured the “religious” right with his anti-abortion message. From there we slithered into the Republican utopia of corporate dictatorship, poverty, ignorance and unaffordability.

        • keiko@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          echo “In fact, sometimes you get the impression they’re the only ones who vote.” echo “” > this.nation

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      20 hours ago

      “God put those fossils there to test our faith!”

      Always gets me.

      They’d sooner believe that their god would lie to them rather than that they’re wrong.

      • thallamabond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Not to them, their god lies to SCIENTISTS and not THEM! They know better than to follow the false breadcrumbs left by their almighty.

    • arrow74@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      The problem is they turn the ridicule around to “confirm” their beliefs and push themselves further in.

      Cult behavior

    • DandomRude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The sad thing is that even mockery probably won’t help much, because this type of person, unfortunately, defends their ignorance with the very same, utterly idiotic strategy that allows those who control them to shield their outrageous nonsense from rational arguments: They convince their deluded followers that they belong to “the select few” who know the truth—“the enlightened”, or whatever they call themselfs. Thus, they proudly flaunt their absurd ignorance, paying no heed to arguments or ridicule, since they are genuinely convinced that they are the only ones who cannot be deceived.

      However, these people cannot—and, above all, do not want to—realize that the deception lies precisely in their leaders’ strategy, for that would mean, of course, that they have wasted half their lives on some charlatan who has not only shamelessly exploited them but has also made them the laughingstock of society. Their idiocy is an integral part of their self-image and their personality, which is why turning away from it often means turning away from everything by which they define themselves - and that surely is a hard thing to do.

      These are the typical tactics used by cult leaders. Unfortunately, there is an frighteningly high number of people who are susceptible to them—and not just in matters of religion, as the MAGA cult makes abundantly clear: It operates according to the same logic—an in-group is formed and sworn to the cult leaders’ goals, with the immediate understanding that rationality must be replaced by slavish faith in the leader or some kind of promise of salvation, because otherwise the cult members would, of course, immediately see through all the crude lies.

      It’s truly amazing that even in an age when almost everyone carries the entirety of human knowledge in their pocket, it still works, but unfortunately, the internet also has the effect of bringing like-minded people together in their absurd worldview, as is the case with Truth Social, for example—though the name of this deranged platform already makes it very obvious that it is a tool designed precisely and exclusively to fulfill the aforementioned cult tactics.

      Edit: Of course, you’re still absolutely right: scorn and contempt are the only things one can show toward people like this—they themselves are probably beyond redemption anyway, but openly rejecting them makes it harder for them to recruit new members for their cult. These people should be treated for what they are: a danger to society, even if they themselves are often nothing more than foot soldiers who may even be unwittingly advancing the interests of their evil masters.

    • Airfried@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s probably corny to reference Star Wars here but Andor really nailed it with the Mon Mothma speech when she said the distance between what’s said in the senate and known to be true has become an abyss and that the loss of an objective reality was perhaps the most dangerous thing to risk in a democracy. There is no common ground to have with these nutjobs because every time you offer them an inch, they’ll ask for a mile more.

  • mrfriki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Ok, I guess I’m too lost to christian logic… Where exactly the 6000-6500 years figure is supposed to come from?

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Setting Jesus’ birth on December 25, 0001CE, and then working backwards through all the "And Fleggorath lived a hundred and sixty-eight years and begat Smacko, who lived four hundred and twenty two years and begat Yalky"s until you hit Adam. You arrive at something like 4004BCE. Add the 2025 years since and you get 6029 years. I’ve seen some wackos claim to have calculated it to the day.

      For some context, writing emerged in Mesopotamia and Egypt around 3200BCE, and the oldest known cave painting, a hand print on Muna Island in Indonesia, is over 67,000 years old and was made by a Neanderthal, not a Human.

      • Kacarott@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Not only do many religions/sects think they have worked out it out to the day, many also work in the other direction. They read way too much into the various prophecies in Daniel and Revelations, etc, and have claimed to worked out the exact day that Jesus will return. One such example was known as “The great disappointment”

    • dwemthy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Pretty sure it’s based on all the “so and so who was 300 years old begat so and so who lived to 250 years old etc”

  • BillyClark@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    1 day ago

    The author of that review also doesn’t know how to use punctuation.

    “They gave inaccurate information from a Christian perspective,” is most straightforwardly read as if the person giving the information is Christian.

    Whereas, “They gave inaccurate information, from a Christian perspective,” is what they meant, that the receiver of the information is Christian.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The Venn Diagram of People who believe a literal interpretation of the Bible & People who don’t know how to write well, is pretty much a circle within a circle.

      • BillyClark@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        That makes me think. Has there ever been a person who actually wrote a lot of fiction, like a novelist or something, who read the Bible and didn’t see signs that the authors were mostly either making shit up or retelling a story that they heard? Like, if it really was the inspired word of God, like God is just whispering in people’s ears, you’d think an author would sense something unusual or different about the quality of the writing, but it’s really no different from any old shit that some human might write.

        So, it may in fact be that the only people who can believe in a literal interpretation of the Bible are people who cannot write well. Once you learn to write well, you lose the ability to believe in the literal interpretation of the Bible. Well, that ignores the real problem of compartmentalization, but it’s an interesting idea, I think.

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      that immediately annoyed me as well. I was ready to discount this person’s opinion before I even finished reading it.

    • keiko@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, I had originally read it as if the tour guide was giving incorrect information, like by using religious terminology instead of B.C.E./C.E.

        • keiko@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          lol, in my defense I had that thought after only reading the first 2 sentences, and I could see a cave tour including information like “This cave was discovered in <year> B.C.E./C.E.” But “300 million B.C.E.” would certainly get me to literally laugh out loud if a cave tour guide said that.